Skechers Responds to Judge’s Order in Adidas Infringement Case

PUBLISHED
CATEGORY
READING TIME
< 1 minutes

Table of Contents

Share
Author
Andrew Rapacke
Andrew Rapacke is a registered patent attorney and serves as Managing Partner at The Rapacke Law Group, a full service intellectual property law firm.

Last week a California judge handed down several rulings in favor of Adidas in its suit against Sketchers for allegedly copying several designs including the iconic three stripe logo, its Supernova trademark, and the design of its popular Stan Smith shoe.

As the Court points out, Adidas and Sketchers have been locked in ongoing litigation since 1995, and the present case is merely another layer in this feud.

The Court denied several of Sketchers’ motions and granted several of Adidas’ including a motion for summary judgment against Sketchers’ functionality affirmative defense to claims of trade dress infringement.

Despite the slough of negative rulings, Sketchers has found a silver lining regarding the allegations of trademark infringement. For Adidas’ three stripe logo, the Court found that the “E” design on Sketchers’ Cross Court shoe was not similar when viewed in a pre-sale context.

Sketchers will likely rely heavily on this point as part of its likelihood of confusion analysis for the purchasing consumers to show that any post-sale similarities would not have affected purchasing decisions.

Source: Footwear News

Schedule a Free Strategy Call
  • Get help identifying what type of IP protection may the best fit for your situation.
  • We explain every step of the IP protection process
  • Get answers to your questions.

Recommended for you

Want more actionable IP tips like this delivered straight to your inbox?