
Types of Claims In Medical Device Patent Applications
In the US, assuming the statutory criteria are met, patents are granted by the US Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) to an inventor for his or her new invention. The…
[SERVICE]Medical device patents
We claim the device, how clinicians use it and how it is made, so a competitor can’t copy one part and leave the rest. Registered patent attorneys, at a flat fee per step.
Your attorneys
Andrew RapackeManaging Partner · Registered Patent AttorneyElectrical and computer engineering. Former Naval Engineering Officer.
Chris WattRegistered Patent Attorney · Former USPTO ExaminerSoftware, AI and machine learning, and MedTech. A full-stack software engineer.[01]Who it's for
Physician-inventors, device startups and growing MedTech companies all start the same way. Find out what is new about the device, then claim it in every form a competitor could copy.
A new mechanism, shape or way of placing it, claimed as a device and as a method of use.
Hardware that measures, images or tracks a signal, claimed around how it gets a better reading.
The device on the body and the app or platform it talks to, protected as one system.
Software that analyzes patient data or images, claimed as a technical process tied to a clinical result.
Industries we file in
[02]What's patentable
Most devices carry more than one invention. The structure, the way it is used, the way it is made and the kit it ships in can each be claimed, and a strong application claims several of them.
The device also has to be new and non-obvious. The $999 search tells you where you stand before you spend on filing.
[03]Claim types
Usually more than one. Each claim type reaches a different competitor, so a medical device application mixes apparatus, method, system and kit claims around the same invention.
| What it covers | Who it reaches | Example | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apparatus (device) | The structure. You name the device, list its parts and say how they connect | Anyone who makes, sells, imports or uses the device | A catheter with a new tip geometry |
| Method of use | The steps of using the device on a patient or in a procedure | Whoever performs the steps, with limits for doctors explained below | Placing an implant through a new approach |
| Method of manufacture | How the device is made or assembled | A competitor making the device that way | A molding step that removes a weak seam |
| System | The device working with other equipment it is used with | Whoever sells or runs the complete setup | A sensor, a base station and the software that reads it |
| Kit | A set of parts the buyer assembles before use | Whoever packages and sells the set | A surgical tray with a guide, a driver and implants |
A comprehensive application claims the invention in several of these forms at once. If a competitor designs around one, another still reads on what they sell. More on types of claims in medical device patent applications.
[04]Design patents
A design patent protects how a device looks, and in medicine that look often does real work. A distinctive handle, housing or screen helps clinicians tell your device apart and is hard for a competitor to copy closely without infringing.
A design patent lasts 15 years from the date it is granted, with no maintenance fees. Our design patent flat fee is $3,200 with every office action included, and it is covered by The RLG Guarantee. If the USPTO denies your design application, you get a full refund.
Many devices are protected by a utility patent on how they work and a design patent on how they look. More on design patents and the value of design patents in a medical device portfolio.
[05]Devices and software
Many medical devices today are two inventions. A device on or in the body, and the app or platform that reads it. We protect both sides, and the way they work together.
A fitness tracker, a portable monitor or an on-body sensor usually has a hardware invention in how it senses and a software invention in how the data is processed and acted on. We claim the device, the method the software performs and the system as a whole, so a competitor cannot copy the device and swap the app, or the other way around.
Software that analyzes images, signals or patient data can be patent eligible when it is claimed as a specific technical process, such as how an algorithm cleans a sensor signal or finds a structure in an image. Software that only collects, shows or tracks data is less likely to qualify. Our software patent and medical device practices work these applications together. More on when software becomes a medical device.
Diagnostics need care. A claim that only observes a natural correlation, such as a marker level that predicts a condition, is treated as a law of nature, as the Supreme Court held in Mayo v. Prometheus in 2012. A claim that applies that finding to a particular treatment, or that recites a new way of measuring it, is on firmer ground. The way the application is drafted decides which side of that line it falls on.
More on common patent eligibility rejections for medical device inventions.
[06]How we draft
Every application has independent claims, the broadest statement of the invention, and dependent claims that narrow step by step toward the version you will put on the market. We write both on purpose. Broad claims make the patent harder to design around. At least one claim describes your commercial device closely, so there is a clear claim to point to if someone copies it.
You do not need FDA clearance, trial results or a finished prototype to file. The application has to describe the device and how it works in enough detail for someone in the field to make and use it. Test data can help support some claims later.
What the application says about how well the device works will be read by examiners, the FDA, investors and, one day, a court. We describe the technical result without overstating safety or efficacy, and keep the application consistent with what you tell the FDA. More on statements of efficacy in medical device patents.
No prototype is needed. Your attorney turns the call into the description the application needs.
[07]FDA and your patent
The USPTO decides whether you can stop others from making the device. The FDA decides whether anyone can market it. They run on separate tracks, but the FDA path changes when to file, what to say and how long the patent can last.
| 510(k) | De Novo | PMA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it is for | Devices substantially equivalent to a legally marketed device | Novel devices with no legally marketed predicate, where general or special controls are enough | Class III devices, the highest risk, on the most stringent pathway |
| What the FDA decides | Whether the device is as safe and effective as the predicate | Which class the new device belongs in | Whether there is valid scientific evidence it is safe and effective |
| Does it decide patentability | No. Equivalence to a predicate is a different question from whether your device is new and non-obvious | No | No |
| Patent term extension | Not available | Not available | Available, if you apply within 60 days of approval |
| When to file the patent | Before any public disclosure | Before any public disclosure | Before any public disclosure, including clinical trial postings |
In the US, your own disclosure does not count against you if you file within one year of it. Most other countries give no such grace period. A provisional application before a trial posting, conference abstract, investor deck or sales conversation keeps both open.
It is not infringement to make or use a patented device solely for uses reasonably related to developing and submitting information to the FDA. The Supreme Court applied that safe harbor to medical devices in Eli Lilly v. Medtronic in 1990. A competitor can test against your device for its own submission. The exemption ends where those uses end.
A patent on a device that went through premarket approval can be extended for part of the time spent in clinical trials and FDA review, up to five years. The application has to be filed within 60 days of FDA approval, so plan it before the approval letter arrives. More on patent term extension for medical devices.
For how the two paths run side by side, see our medical device patent attorneys page and IP and FDA regulatory strategies. General information, not regulatory advice. Your pathway depends on the device and its classification.
[08]The flat-fee path
Every step is quoted before any work begins, and the search fee is credited when you file. Most device inventors file a provisional before any public disclosure, then the full application within 12 months.
01Start here
$999
Patentable or your money back. Credited when you file
Report in about 5 days
Not patentable, full refund*02Then
$2.5k–3.5k
Set by the device. Search fee credited
Patent pending the day it is filed
Patentability issues, full refund*03Within 12 months
$7k–12k
Drawings and USPTO filing fees included
Filed before your 12-month deadline
Flat fee, not covered by the guarantee*Refunds subject to the RLG Guarantee Policy in your engagement letter. Utility (non-provisional) patents are quoted flat and are not covered by the guarantee. How The RLG Guarantee works
[09]The process
What happens at each step and who does the work. Timing shown is typical, never a promised date.
Medical device patentSearch to grant
[10]Whole-life cost
Our fees are flat and quoted before work begins. What comes later is USPTO fees and any office action responses, so plan for both.
| Stage | When | What you pay |
|---|---|---|
| Patentability search | Before you file | $999 flat fee, credited toward your application |
| Provisional application | Month 0 | $2,500 to $3,500 flat fee, set by the device |
| Non-provisional application | By month 12 | $7,000 to $12,000 flat fee, with drawings and USPTO filing fees included |
| Design patent, if the look matters | Any time, ideally before launch | $3,200 flat fee, office actions included |
| Office action responses | Often 18 to 24 months after filing | $2,500 to $3,500 per response, quoted flat before any work begins |
| USPTO issue fee | When the patent is allowed | $1,290, or $516 for a small entity and $258 for a micro entity |
| USPTO maintenance fee | 3.5 years after grant | $2,150, or $860 for a small entity and $430 for a micro entity |
| USPTO maintenance fee | 7.5 years after grant | $4,040, or $1,616 for a small entity and $808 for a micro entity |
| USPTO maintenance fee | 11.5 years after grant | $8,280, or $3,312 for a small entity and $1,656 for a micro entity |
USPTO fees are from the USPTO fee schedule effective January 19, 2025, and the USPTO adjusts them from time to time. Small entity status generally applies to companies with fewer than 500 employees, and micro entity status has income and filing limits. If a maintenance fee goes unpaid, the patent expires early. More on small and micro entity status for device companies.
[11]Questions
Still deciding? Your first call is free and comes with a straight answer on whether to file.
Book A Free Strategy CallUsually several. Apparatus claims cover the device itself, method claims cover how it is used or made, system claims cover it working with other equipment, and kit claims cover a set of parts sold together. A strong application mixes them so a competitor cannot avoid every claim by changing one thing.
Start with a patentability search to see what already exists. Then file a provisional application before any public disclosure, which makes you patent pending, and file the full application within 12 months. The USPTO examines the full application, and most patents are granted 2 to 3 years after it is filed.
With us, a $999 patentability search, a provisional application at $2,500 to $3,500 depending on the device, and a non-provisional application at $7,000 to $12,000 with drawings and USPTO filing fees included. After filing, plan for office action responses, quoted flat before any work begins, the USPTO issue fee and maintenance fees at 3.5, 7.5 and 11.5 years after grant.
No. Patent filing and FDA review are separate, and FDA approval is not a requirement for a patent. The application has to describe how the device works well enough for someone in the field to build and use it. Filing first is usually safer, because trial postings and submissions can make the invention public.
Yes, if the improvement is new and not obvious, such as a new mechanism, a new sensor arrangement or a better way of reaching the clinical result. The claims cover the improvement, not the device it builds on. The search shows how close existing devices come.
Yes, a new surgical or treatment method can be patented. But the law bars infringement remedies against doctors and their hospitals for performing a patented procedure, unless the claim covers use of a patented device. That is why we claim the device and the kit alongside the method.
No. A patent lets you stop others from making, using or selling your invention. It does not clear you to sell, because your device could still use someone else's patented feature, and the FDA decides whether it can be marketed. A freedom to operate review looks at other people's patents before launch.
Yes, within limits. Making or using a patented device solely to develop and submit information to the FDA is not infringement. Once the competitor goes beyond that, for example by selling the device, your patent applies.
A utility patent generally lasts 20 years from the date the full application is filed, with maintenance fees due along the way. A device that went through premarket approval may get part of its FDA review time back through patent term extension. A design patent lasts 15 years from grant.
Often, yes. The method the app performs, such as how it processes sensor data or adjusts the device, can be claimed alongside the device, and the look of its screens can be protected with a design patent. An app that only collects or displays data is less likely to qualify on its own. The patentability search tells you where it stands before you file.
The patentability search, the provisional application and design patents. If the search finds your device is not novel, you get a full refund or another search. If patentability issues come up on your provisional, you get a full refund or more searches. If the USPTO denies your design application, you get a full refund. Non-provisional applications are not covered. Refunds are subject to the RLG Guarantee Policy in your engagement letter.
[12]Learning Center

In the US, assuming the statutory criteria are met, patents are granted by the US Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) to an inventor for his or her new invention. The…

Learning how to file a medical device patent is crucial for innovators in the MedTech industry, as navigating this complex path can be daunting. This article paves the…

As with any invention, it is important for innovators and medical device companies to understand that there is a difference between patent novelty and commercial novelty…
[13]Client reviews
4.7 across 614 public reviews on Google, Trustpilot and Avvo.
#1Top reviewed IP law firm*
Read client reviews“I can safely trust them with scientific and legal integrity regarding ownership and accountability of inventions.”
“It gave us peace of mind knowing the total cost for this service was included in their flat-fee proposal.”
“Completed the patent search and utility patent within weeks.”
Reviews reflect individual client experiences. Quotes are excerpts. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. *#1 top reviewed means the most public client reviews on Google, Trustpilot and Avvo of any US patent or trademark firm.
Talk through your device with a registered patent attorney. The call is free, with no obligation.