Technology transfer agreements that move IP from lab to market
We draft, review and negotiate the agreements that move a patent, software or know-how to the company that will sell it, and we protect the IP itself, so the rights match.
For founders licensing in, and owners licensing out.
Technology transfer turns research and development into revenue. Done well, it sets who owns what, who may use it, and what each side gets when it succeeds.
Startups licensing university technology
A spinout or a founder taking an exclusive license from a university or federal lab, with milestones you can meet.
Universities and research teams
Inventors and labs moving a discovery into a company, with fair compensation and clear reporting.
Companies licensing out
Owners who want royalties from a patent, software or know-how without giving up ownership.
Co-development partners
Two companies building together, with ownership of improvements settled before the work starts.
[02]What we handle
Transfer the right rights, and only those.
A technology transfer agreement is only as good as the rights behind it. We read the patents and the ownership records, then write the grant around them.
We also look at existing patents and trademarks, regulatory requirements and the commercial obstacles to the deal before terms are set.
What we draft and negotiate
License grantsExclusive, non-exclusive or limited to a field of use or territory.
AssignmentsA full transfer of ownership, recorded with the USPTO where it applies.
Royalties and milestonesUpfront fees, running royalties, minimums and performance milestones.
Improvements and sublicensingWho owns later improvements and derivative works, and whether the licensee may sublicense.
Risks we check before you sign
A gap in the chain of titleAn inventor who never assigned their rights can leave the licensor unable to grant them.
Federal funding obligationsResearch paid for with federal money carries conditions the license has to respect.
Export controlsSome technical data cannot leave the US, or reach certain people, without a license.
A grant broader than the patentPaying for rights the patents do not actually cover.
[03]The basics
What is a technology transfer agreement?
A technology transfer agreement is a contract that moves the right to use, develop or sell a technology from one party to another. It can cover patents, software, technical data and know-how, and it usually comes from a university, a federal lab or a company that built the technology but will not commercialize it alone.
Types of technology transfer agreements
Agreement
What it does
Typical use
License
Lets the licensee use the technology while the owner keeps it
A startup commercializing a university patent
Assignment
Transfers ownership outright
A founder moving IP into the company, or a sale of a patent
Option agreement
Reserves the right to take a license later
Time to test the technology or raise money first
Sponsored research agreement
Funds research and sets who owns the results
A company paying a lab to develop something specific
Material transfer agreement
Covers samples, prototypes or materials sent for research
Testing before any license
Non-disclosure agreement
Keeps the technical details confidential during talks
Every early conversation
CRADA
A cooperative research and development agreement with a federal lab
Joint work with a government laboratory
Key terms in a technology transfer agreement
Grant and scope. Exactly what is licensed, in which field of use and territory, and whether it is exclusive.
Payments. Upfront fees, royalties on sales, minimum annual royalties, sublicense income and, for startups, sometimes equity.
Diligence and milestones. What the licensee must do, and by when, to keep an exclusive license.
Improvements. Who owns improvements and derivative works made by either side.
Patent costs and enforcement. Who pays to prosecute and maintain the patents, and who can sue an infringer.
Confidentiality, warranties and indemnity. What each side promises about the technology and who carries the risk.
Term, termination and disputes. How the agreement ends and how disagreements are resolved, through negotiation, mediation, arbitration or court.
Due diligence before you sign
Before terms are set, we check what is really being transferred.
Legal status. Whether the patents are granted, pending or expired, and whether maintenance fees are paid.
Ownership. Every inventor’s assignment, and any co-owner or funding agency with rights.
Existing rights. Earlier licenses, options or liens that limit what can be granted.
Surrounding IP. Related patents and trademarks held by others that could block the product.
Regulatory path. Approvals the product will need, such as FDA review for a medical device.
Commercial obstacles. Anything that could make the milestones or royalties unrealistic.
Most technology transfers are one or the other. The difference decides who owns the IP when the deal ends.
License and assignment compared
License
Assignment
Who owns the IP
The licensor keeps ownership
The buyer becomes the owner
How it is paid
Often royalties over time, with fees or milestones
Usually a lump sum, sometimes with earn-outs
Can it be limited
Yes, by field, territory, time or exclusivity
No. Ownership moves as a whole, though a license can be granted back
When it ends
Rights return to the owner
Ownership stays with the buyer
Recording
Exclusive patent licenses can be recorded with the USPTO
Patent assignments should be recorded with the USPTO
Assignments matter inside a startup too. Founders and contractors should assign their inventions to the company in writing, or investors will find the gap in diligence. See our IP licensing agreements and assignments page.
[05]University and federal research
Licensing technology from a university or federal lab.
Most university inventions are licensed through the school’s technology transfer office, and many were funded at least in part by the federal government. That brings rules a private deal does not have.
Federally funded inventions
Under the Bayh-Dole Act, a university or small business may keep title to inventions made with federal funding, with conditions. The government keeps a non-exclusive license to use the invention, the owner must report it, and an exclusive licensee generally has to manufacture products sold in the US substantially in the US unless a waiver is granted. A license that ignores these terms can be challenged later.
Export controls
Some technical data and software are export-controlled. Sharing them with a foreign partner, or with foreign nationals inside the US, can require a government license. The agreement should say who is responsible for compliance.
Conflicts of interest
When a faculty inventor also holds equity in the startup taking the license, the university will have conflict-of-interest rules. Planning for them early keeps the deal from stalling.
[06]Fees
One flat fee, quoted before work begins.
There is no hourly billing. Your technology transfer agreement is quoted as a flat fee on your strategy call, once the scope is clear, and nothing starts until you approve it.
What sets the fee is the work itself, not the time on the clock.
The agreement type. A license, assignment, option or research agreement.
Who drafts first. Writing the first draft, or reviewing and negotiating the other side’s.
How much diligence it needs. The number of patents, owners and funding sources to check.
Ongoing work for a growing company can run on a monthly Fractional IP Counsel plan instead of one fee per document. This service is not covered by The RLG Guarantee, which applies to patentability searches, provisional patents, design patents and trademarks.
[07]The process
From first call to a signed agreement.
What happens at each step and who does the work. Timing depends on the other side and is never a promised date.
Technology transferCall to signed
Day one01Day oneStrategy callFree. Walk us through the deal, the documents or the problem.
Flat fee02Flat feeScope and flat feeWhat the work covers and its price, in writing, before it begins.
03Diligence and draftingWe check the IP, then draft or mark up the agreement.
04NegotiationTerms worked through with the other side, with you approving each change.
05Signed and recordedExecuted, and recorded with the USPTO where it applies.
[08]Questions
Questions about technology transfer agreements.
Still deciding? Your first call is free and comes with a straight answer on what the agreement needs.
A contract that moves the right to use, develop or sell a technology from one party to another. It may be a license, where the owner keeps the IP, or an assignment, where ownership moves. It sets the scope of the rights, the payments and what each side must do.
What is the difference between a license and an assignment?
A license lets someone use the technology while the owner keeps it, and it can be limited by field, territory or time. An assignment transfers ownership outright. If you need to own the IP, for example to raise money on it, an assignment or an exclusive license is usually required.
How do startups license technology from a university?
Through the university’s technology transfer office. The startup usually signs an option or license with milestones, royalties and sometimes equity for the university. Because many university inventions are federally funded, the license also has to respect the Bayh-Dole Act.
What royalty rate is typical?
There is no single rate. It depends on the industry, how close the technology is to a product, exclusivity and what else the licensee contributes. Negotiating a rate that works at your margins is part of the agreement work.
Who owns improvements made after the license?
Whoever the agreement says. Without a clear improvements clause, disputes are common. Startups often negotiate to own the improvements their own team makes.
Do technology transfer agreements need to be recorded?
Patent assignments should be recorded with the USPTO, generally within three months, to protect the new owner against a later buyer who did not know about it. Exclusive licenses can be recorded too.
How much does a technology transfer agreement cost?
With us it is a flat fee, quoted on your strategy call before any work begins. The fee depends on the type of agreement, whether we draft or negotiate the other side’s draft, and how much diligence the IP needs.
What is technology transfer? Technology transfer is the shifting of skills, capital, knowledge, and value of innovation from the point of conception to actual reduction…
Learn what a patent licensing agreement grants, how exclusive and non-exclusive terms differ, and which clauses protect you. Book a free IP strategy call.
You have an age-old chicken and egg dilemma on your hands. You have a revolutionary invention that you want to get out there are start licensing. Unfortunately, if you…
Read the article
[10]Client reviews
Clients who built with us.
4.7 across 614 public reviews on Google, Trustpilot and Avvo.
“Andrew Rapacke and his team are exceptional. They did our provisional and non provisional patents. The entire team is professional and an ease to work with.”
VDVon DorjevskiFounder, Inguardia Health · Client review
“I can safely trust them with scientific and legal integrity regarding ownership and accountability of inventions.”
HAHussain AtherPatent · Client review
“The Rapacke Group stands by their fees with no surprises.”
LCLowell CrawfordClient review
Reviews reflect individual client experiences. Quotes are excerpts. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. *#1 top reviewed means the most public client reviews on Google, Trustpilot and Avvo of any US patent or trademark firm.
Move the technology, keep the value.
Talk through the deal and the IP behind it. The call is free, with no obligation.