
Can You Patent AI? What the USPTO Actually Grants in 2026
Can you patent AI? Learn what the USPTO requires, how the Alice test applies, and how to protect your AI invention. Get a free IP strategy call today.

What is a patent portfolio development strategy? A patent portfolio development strategy is a business plan to develop commercially valuable patents, protect innovations and technology with patents, and monetize the patents.
How do you build a patent portfolio development strategy? Start by understanding the basics of patents and the scope of their protection, then determine what innovative aspects of your business and its technology are patent eligible. Combined with your knowledge of innovation trends in your industry, you can then develop a short and long term strategy within your vertical.
A patent portfolio is a collection of patent applications and granted patents held by one company, inventor, or institution, usually covering several aspects of a core technology. Its value comes from layering: patents on different methods, implementations, and claim types make it much harder for competitors to work in your space without a license.
A single patent protects one specific implementation, not the business idea or future versions of the product, and a competitor with skilled counsel can often design around it. As Tesla’s 2014 patent announcement put it, patents have historically been “small protection indeed against a determined competitor” (Tesla).
Multiple related patents make designing around your IP far more expensive and enable cross-licensing, where companies trade access to each other’s patents, as is common in telecommunications. Qualcomm’s licensing segment reported $5.58 billion in revenue in fiscal 2025 (Qualcomm). The benefits of patent protection go well beyond litigation.
AI and software inventions face extra eligibility scrutiny after the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International. A USPTO study found that first-action eligibility rejections in Alice-affected technologies rose 31% in the 18 months after Alice, then fell 25% in the year after the USPTO’s 2019 guidance (USPTO, Adjusting to Alice). Annual U.S. AI patent applications more than doubled from 2002 to 2018, to over 60,000, nearly 16% of all applications (USPTO, Inventing AI). Since one broad AI claim can fall as an abstract idea, layering utility patents, continuations, and design patents removes that single point of failure, the core of a defensive patent strategy.
What is a patent? A patent is a government grant of “the right to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale, or selling the invention throughout the United States or importing the invention into the United States” (35 U.S.C. § 154). It does not give you a right to make or sell a product: a patented medicine, for example, still needs FDA approval before it can be sold.
Utility patents are the foundation. They protect how an invention functions, generally for 20 years from filing, and for AI companies cover model architectures, training methods, and inference systems. In Enfish v. Microsoft and McRO v. Bandai Namco (2016), the Federal Circuit held that claims directed to a specific improvement in computer functionality are not abstract ideas.
Software and AI patents after Alice remain available with careful drafting. The USPTO’s 2019 eligibility guidance now sits in MPEP 2106 and has been updated since, including a July 2024 AI update and the precedential Ex parte Desjardins decision, added in December 2025, which treated claims that improve how a machine learning model is trained as eligible (USPTO eligibility guidance).
Design patents are the underused asset. They protect the ornamental look of an item, including software interfaces and AI dashboards, last 15 years from grant, need no maintenance fees, and cost less in USPTO fees than utility patents (USPTO fee schedule).
While most patent portfolio development strategies will have common elements, it is critical to outline and understand your business goals.
When you are initially starting your business, chances are that you have a limited budget. A key consideration is timely identification and selection of the innovations that will best grow and protect your business. Once your business generates significant revenue and operates within a larger budget, it is likely to expand the criteria for selecting inventions to patent. You may want to file patents for alternative technologies to block competitors from developing competing products, and consider international patent protection. For large / multinational businesses, patent-related activities include monitoring competitor products, patent assertion through litigation, defensive budgets for infringement allegations, managing patent prosecution through outside counsel, and managing international intellectual property portfolios.
Knowing your business and industry is essential when discussing patent portfolio development strategies with your patent attorney.
When you have multiple inventions and a limited budget, how do you choose among the alternatives? Ask yourself, if you had the perfect patent, what would that patent block your competitor from achieving? What are the minimum number of elements, parts, components, processes, and the like, that, if incorporated into a product, would be a copy of your innovation? Different inventions will need different answers. Gather those inventions and answers and organize them in order of competitive and economic importance.
Now you will have a list of inventions and technologies in order of importance to your business. With your budget in mind, you can select and prioritize the inventions for which you intend to file patent applications. Before filing, consider the value that a prior art search might bring to your patent applications.
We’ve compiled a list of recent software examples from top companies so you can better understand how to select an invention for a patent protection.
[RLG]Free strategy call

Talk it through with a registered patent attorney.
Free 15 to 45 minute IP strategy call, no obligation.
File when core functionality is first developed rather than after launch. A roadmap review with patent counsel, at least quarterly during active development, finds inventions to file before they are disclosed. Treat filing deadlines as product milestones, not legal afterthoughts.
There are at least two basic benefits to a prior art search.
First, a prior art search informs you about whether your invention warrants filing a patent application or whether the prior art shows that a patent application for your invention is likely to be rejected because its features have been previously disclosed. While prior art searches are not exhaustive and not as nuanced and detailed as the searches done by USPTO Patent Examiners, they often save inventors time and money by identifying easy-to-find prior art that could otherwise result in an easily avoided rejection of a patent application.
Second, a prior art search provides knowledge of some existing prior patents and patent applications, which can be used to improve the details and focus when drafting the patent application for your current invention. Understand how “crowded” a prior art space is will help you determine the scope of your claims.
How do you obtain a prior art search for your invention? Generally, your patent attorney will give you a disclosure questionnaire to complete, and often meets with the inventors to walk through the details. Innovation-focused businesses may also use internal Invention Disclosure Documents, which your patent attorney can develop, so employees can report potential inventions to management.
What strategy should you use for the prior art search? Publicly available search engines may provide some prior art, but a more thorough search needs a professional patent search engine that includes patents and patent applications from the U.S. and from other countries. Searching these additional databases is likely to reveal prior art that is not easily accessible to the public, but that a Patent Examiner may find using the USPTO’s powerful searching tools. Whatever search engine you or your patent attorney use, the next step is to identify the most important elements, parts, components, processes, and the like, that together make your invention. A proper prior art search strategy includes searching for those identified elements in patent applications and patents, using relevant targeted keywords and similar concepts.

High-value portfolios combine broad foundational claims on core methods with narrower patents on specific commercial implementations. Broad claims thin on detail are easier to challenge in inter partes review (IPR); deep, narrow claims with little breadth can be designed around. Build on both axes.
Continuation applications let you pursue new claims on the same original disclosure without new R&D spend. Filed while the parent is still pending, they capture claims narrowed during prosecution or features the product later commercializes, and under 35 U.S.C. § 120 they keep the parent’s filing date for anything the original disclosure supports, though they cannot add new matter (USPTO). Divisional applications split out distinct inventions an examiner requires you to separate. Together they are the main tools of a strategy built on multiple filings.
The most common strategy employed by businesses is a defensive patent strategy, aimed at preventing competitors from obtaining patents in your field and technology area by using your patent filings as prior art against them.
When people think about patents, most often they are thinking about an offensive strategy where companies commercialize their patents through licensing. The amount and scope of the applications you file will vary with your overall strategy. In a defensive patent strategy, for example, it is common to see longer disclosures, and an information disclosure statement may list patents and published applications previously identified by Examiners as prior art.
Develop your patent portfolio by continuously identifying, selecting, and budgeting for patent applications, aligned with your business goals. As your business evolves, so should your patent development strategy.
A portfolio earns revenue through licensing, cross-licensing, and sometimes outright assignment. Use NDAs when discussing undisclosed inventions with potential licensees. Marketing patents to companies works best when you know which claims map to products on the market.
When a competitor or a patent assertion entity (a “patent troll”) accuses you of infringement, a counter-portfolio gives you leverage to assert your own patents in response. A freedom-to-operate analysis, a legal opinion on whether your product is likely to infringe existing patents, covers the other side.
Investors look at claim breadth, remaining term, forward citations (how often later patents cite yours), freedom-to-operate clarity, and geographic coverage, not raw patent count. In AI and SaaS due diligence, a strong portfolio is read as proof of technical differentiation. An NBER study found that a startup’s first patent raises its probability of attracting venture capital by 53% (NBER). See how patent valuation works and why patents are important to investors.
A patent audit reviews each asset for validity, claim strength, maintenance fee status, and competitive relevance. Patent mapping overlays your claims against competitors’ products and patents to find white space you have not yet filed on. Run an audit before a fundraise, an acquisition, a licensing negotiation, or a decision to sue, since the weaknesses it finds are the ones the other side will look for.
Patents are territorial: a U.S. patent cannot be enforced in Europe, China, or Japan. PCT and European Patent Office filings extend protection abroad. When Google bought Motorola Mobility for $12.4 billion in 2012, it assigned $5.5 billion of the price to patents and developed technology (TechCrunch, on Google’s SEC filing).
Utility patents need USPTO maintenance fees at 3.5, 7.5, and 11.5 years after grant (35 U.S.C. § 41(b)). Decide patent by patent which ones still justify renewal based on competitive relevance, licensing income, and remaining term, and let the rest lapse.
Narrow claims are easier to get granted, but a competitor can make a small change and avoid them. Pair broad independent claims with dependent claims covering specific commercial versions. When an examiner pushes back, your patent office action response decides whether broad claims survive.
Utility-only portfolios leave interfaces unprotected, skipping continuations freezes your claims at one disclosure, and U.S.-only coverage leaves you exposed where competitors sell abroad.
U.S. law gives inventors a one-year grace period after their own disclosure (35 U.S.C. § 102(b)(1)), but Europe and many other systems require absolute novelty, so a demo or post before filing can cost you foreign rights. Talk to patent counsel before the first demo, not after launch.
Technology startups often find themselves launching in an economy that rewards first-to-market strategies, which can bring short-term gains at the expense of a long-term strategic patent portfolio. Remember two points: (1) you do not have to finish your product before filing a patent application, so you can file while developing your product or service, and (2) when time is of the essence, file a provisional patent application to immediately establish your priority date.
A provisional patent application is an effective placeholder for 12 months before a non-provisional patent application has to be filed. You can describe and detail your invention and its elements without the formal requirements of a non-provisional patent application. Later, when you file a non-provisional (regular) patent application, you can claim the benefit of the earlier filing date of the provisional patent application. You can learn more about provisional patent applications by clicking here.
Because provisionals cost a fraction of a full filing, you can file several across parallel innovation tracks before any public disclosure. A later application gets the provisional’s date only for what the provisional describes, so a thin placeholder protects little. See our guide to startup patent strategy.
If you have a SaaS business, we invite you to see our SaaS Patent Guide by clicking here.
Three by law: utility, design, and plant. In a tech or AI portfolio, four filings do most of the work: utility patents, provisional applications (low-cost priority dates), continuation applications (more claims from one disclosure), and design patents.
Patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets. Patents protect technical innovations, trademarks protect brand identity, copyrights protect original code and creative work, and trade secrets protect confidential processes.
In June 2014, Musk announced that Tesla would not start patent lawsuits against anyone using its technology in good faith, to speed up electric vehicle adoption. Most startups lack Tesla’s scale, so giving up their patents rarely makes sense.
There is no fixed number. A few well-drafted patents and applications covering distinct aspects of your core technology can be a meaningful start; claim breadth, validity, and relevance to your product matter more than count.
Years. A provisional can be filed within weeks to set a priority date, but a utility patent often takes two years or more to grant (USPTO pendency data), and PCT filings extend the timeline.
Check our intelligent IP Quiz to get immediate results to start the patent protection process, see our AI Patent Mastery resource for AI-specific strategy, or schedule a free consultation with an experienced SaaS IP patent attorney.
[RLG]Free strategy call

Talk it through with a registered patent attorney.
The #1 top reviewed IP law firm.* Talk to a registered patent attorney, free.
*#1 top reviewed means the most public client reviews on Google, Trustpilot and Avvo of any US patent or trademark firm.